data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/365a6/365a6ecf41e4d5cbd267bcc0ea70a43e8f2fe730" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e32f9/e32f9471580c757a8dd9de7b3d900c63693dd84d" alt=""
The cover of Sarah's Key. It has recently been made into a movie as well...
The novel cycles back and forth between two different stories. The first is about a 10-year-old girl named Sarah. She is a French-born Jewish girl living in Paris during the Second World War. In the middle of the night, the French police bang on her door and demand the family leaves their home at once. Convinced she would only be gone for a short period of time, Sarah locks her four-year-old brother Michael in a hidden cupboard. Pocketing the key, she promises she will return soon to set him free.
The second story is about Julia, an American-born journalist living in Paris. Set in modern-day Europe, Julia prepares to move into a newly-renovated apartment with her French husband and teenage daughter. However, a story Julia has been chosen to write for a local newspaper unknowingly connects Julia’s new apartment with Sarah’s past 60 years prior.
The central event that both stories revolve around is the Vel' d'Hiv Roundup. It was a Nazi decreed raid and mass arrest in Paris by the French police on July 16-17, 1942. The aim of the roundup was to decrease the Jewish population in occupied France. Over 13,000 people – mostly women and children – were rounded up and given little time to collect personal belongings before being whisked away into the night.
Most of the arrested people were taken to the Vélodrome d'hiver. It was a large recreational facility primarily used for biking, and was located near the Eiffel Tower. The arrested Jews were held prisoner in the stifling-hot facility. They had no lavatories: of the 10 available, five were sealed because their windows offered a way out and the others were blocked. There was only one water tap, and food was infrequently available. Those who tried to escape were shot on the spot, and a number of people took their own lives.
French Jews held prisoner, circa 1942.*
After five days, the prisoners were hustled into city buses and transported out of Paris. They were first taken to internment camps on the outskirts of the city, and were later distributed to extermination camps. The majority ended up at Auschwitz.
The Vel' d'Hiv Roundup is an event that most people know little about. When I visited Paris in 2009, my hotel was located blocks from where the biking facility once stood. I had no idea such a tragedy occurred, and if I did, I would have made sure I took a moment to walk by the site where so many people suffered.
Sarah’s Key is a tribute to the families who were taken from their homes on July 16, 1942, never to return. It is a somber, graphic and heart wrenching story, and I guarantee you will feel haunted after reading it. With that being said, I believe it is a magnificent and important novel that sheds light on a less-known yet equally tragic event that took place during the Second World War.
Read it. McNally Robinson’s Bargain Books section is waiting for you…
*Images taken from Google.
The following was a CreComm journalism assignment I wrote on November 11, 2009. I think it's one of the best stories I've ever written, and I'll let it speak for itself...
Remembrance Day at the Minto Armouries was celebrated by hundreds of sombre men, women, and children. They crowded the main floor and filled the balcony, eager to find a decent spot to watch the ceremony. Military personnel wearing formal uniforms, camouflage, and kilts stood in formation and awaited instructions. Many people in the audience wept throughout the ceremony, especially during the moments of silence.
Sgt. Smith, from the Queens Own Cameron Highlanders, quietly explained that attendance at this year’s ceremony was down. “There are fewer people this year than last, and I believe that is directly related to H1N1,” he said. “But since our troops entered Afghanistan in 2002, many more people have started coming. I’ve attended for 35 years, and it’s moving to see that people care enough to come to a ceremony.”
The young Air Cadets were among the many uniformed personnel who stood in formation on the main floor. Trevor Malcolm, a former cadet instructor, explained that his favourite part of the ceremony was watching the youths break formation.
“We count every year,” he explained. “They have to stand at attention for the whole ceremony, and many start to get dizzy and sick. They are instructed to go down on one knee when they can’t stand anymore, and someone comes to get them.” A number of officers swarmed the area, waiting to rescue anyone who began to sway.
In total, 28 white-faced cadets were removed during the ceremony.
“We think it’s a metaphor,” said Malcolm’s wife, Nancy. “They drop so quickly. But, in an actual war or conflict, that’s how quickly a soldier dies. One second they are fine, the next they are dead. It’s sad... so very sad.”
“It’s easy to forget about Remembrance Day, if you sit at home and don’t get involved,” she added. “But it’s important for everyone not to forget. These are our people, this is our history, and if we forget we’re destined to repeat the past.”
Note: All of the above names have been changed.
In my haste to graduate, find a job, buy a car and start a little life, I neglected to resume reading the work of one of the greatest historical fiction writers of this generation.
Known primarily by non-historical fiction readers for her widely-popular The Other Boleyn Girl, Gregory has written eight additional novels including The Constant Princess, which I just finished last night. This novel chronicles the life of a character I haven’t really thought about previously – Katherine of Aragon, Henry VIII’s first wife – and shines light on her life.
Tudor England is the period Gregory focusses on in most of her novels. The illustrious reign of King Henry VIII is infamously filled with love, sex, drama, violence and vengeance. Throughout his 38 years as ruler, women were constantly vying for his affections – and, of course, the title of Queen. It was a time when one woman could be unceremoniously dumped onto the street with a whispered word from another, which makes any story from this period fascinating reading.
The Constant Princess provides a fictionalized account of Katherine’s life, beginning when she was five years old and continuing until the beginning of the end of her marriage to Henry. The novel is filled with rich details and descriptive paragraphs, making it all too easy to believe that the Katherine portrayed in the novel was really what the Queen of England was like.
Throughout her career, Gregory has received quite a bit of criticism. Historians especially have chastised her for not sticking to history as much as she claims to. When I read accounts of people complaining that “it couldn’t have really happened like that,” I just laugh. We’re talking about people who lived in the 15th century. We have no IDEA how it “really” happened.
I think that Gregory writes fantastic historical fiction. She does her research to ensure people, places, major events and incidents are correct and factual. Then, she takes everything she has read about a person and creates a character.
Katherine of Aragon’s character in The Constant Princess is believable and interesting. It makes me want to learn more. Next, I plan to read The Boleyn Inheritance, and I’m sure it will be just as fantastic – if not better.
What I’ve found interesting is that each wedding I attended was so completely different from all of the others. I think I’ve seen a complete range – from inexpensive yet personal, to thoroughly expensive and trendy. This range of experiences has left me highly confused, and I honestly have no idea what the “right” type of wedding consists of.
Four years ago, my friends Matt and Leah were married. They were the first of our friends to tie the knot, so they had the daunting task of planning the first wedding. Deciding to be unique and original, their marriage ceremony was conducted amongst the ruins of the St. Boniface Monastery. And, to make the setting even more magical, the bride was escorted in via horse and carriage.
It was completely unorthodox, yet inexpensive, gorgeous and magical.
A few months ago, friends Tyler and Kristen were married at St. Luke’s Anglican Church on Nassau Street. The church was chosen specifically for its aesthetic value, because it boasted gorgeous, stained glass windows, a long, center aisle, and a collection of church bells to announce the exit of the newly-married couple.
It was also unorthodox, as neither bride nor groom actually attends that particular church, yet it was definitely magical.
And a few weekends ago, friend’s Kelvin and Tavia were married in the bride’s childhood Catholic church. It was her Reverend who conducted the ceremony, and members of her congregation who led the audience in song and prayer. The ceremony was very traditional, but that is exactly what the couple wanted.
When thinking about the reception, I have experienced everything, including local community centres, banquet halls in hotels, church basements and country clubs. There have been cash bars, open bars, gigantic centrepieces, colourful cakes, dessert bars and even candy and chocolate buffets.
There seems to be no guidelines whatsoever when it comes to the reception, and anything a person imagines can be created.
I will admit... I really DO care about the cake...
So what is considered to be an acceptable cost for a 20-something’s wedding in the 21st century? According to Wiki Answers, anywhere between $25,000 – 50,000 is acceptable for the “common person.” A friend who is currently in the process of planning his wedding told me that $12,000 (including honeymoon) was what his day will cost.
I like the second option much better…
I guess there really is no right or wrong answer, and each couple is free to plan (and spend) what works for them. In the past, a wedding has been an illustration of the wealth of the couple – and their parents. Not anymore. Personally, I think I’m making a more positive example of my financial situation by holding a thrifty yet personal wedding while saving enough money to purchase a house soon after my nuptials.
A few months ago, my childhood friend Mac went back to Afghanistan for his second tour with the Canadian Military.
Before he left, we said a lengthy goodbye. What began as a light-hearted “remember the time when…” chat turned into a detailed discussion about war, its destruction and the people who are left behind to pick up the pieces.
We began talking about various dictators of the 21st century – a topic that was prompted by the capture and death of Osama bin Laden. At the time of our talk, it had only been a few months since his death, meaning the knowledge of his departure was still reasonably fresh in both our minds.
This topic then lead us to discuss our feelings about the publication of high-profile death photographs, videos and images. It is a subject that I’m sure everyone has an opinion about, and if we consider the recently-published gruesome death photos of Muammar Gaddafi, it’s definitely topical.
In the case of Osama bin Laden – who was shot and killed on May 2, 2011 – the actual photographs of his dead body were withheld from both the public and the media. Many factors have been stated as the reason U.S. President Obama decided not to publish the images, including fears it would show a lack of respect and could lead to an angry backlash from extremists.
Makes sense to me.
Next, remember Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi government openly released a video of his December 30, 2006 hanging. In addition, a low-resolution cell phone video capturing Hussein both before and after the execution was illegally downloaded to YouTube, and I believe it’s still available if you search hard enough. Finally, the Iraqi government also released post-mortem photos of Hussein’s body in a shroud.
Was all that really necessary?
We can also take a brief break from dictators and turn to celebrities. Dr. Conrad Murray is still on trial for involuntary manslaughter as a result of singer Michael Jackson’s suspicious death on June 25, 2009. During his trail a few weeks ago, post-mortem autopsy photos of Jackson were shown in the courtroom. Later, they were released to the media and are still available online today.
The photos of the deceased Jackson are sad, disgusting and uncomfortable to look at. Even though it was necessary to show them in court to illustrate Jackson’s health prior to his death, there was no reason for them to be published for the whole world to see.
People – as a general rule – have a fascination with morbidity. We rubber neck while driving past a car accident, and we stop and stare at a homeless person asleep on the sidewalk. It’s just our nature. I’ve been guilty of staring at a few awful things in my day, and I’m willing to admit that I’ve been appallingly fascinated. But just because we’re interested doesn’t mean it is the right thing to do...